Review Guidelines

This guideline explains which reviews are allowed and how we handle notices of legal violations.

1. Core principles

Reviews should be based on genuine usage experience, written objectively, and help other users evaluate a tool.

2. Prohibited content

The following are prohibited in particular:

  • Abusive criticism, insults, threats, hate speech
  • Demonstrably false factual claims
  • Promotional self-reviews or undisclosed conflicts of interest
  • Competitor bashing without plausible usage experience
  • Automated, purchased, or otherwise manipulated reviews

3. Authenticity and abuse prevention

  • Only one active review per tool is allowed per user account.
  • Reviews can be updated; changes are versioned internally.
  • We may temporarily or permanently block accounts in case of abuse.
  • We use plausibility checks (e.g., usage duration, content signals, report history).

4. Notice-and-take-down process

Affected companies or rights holders can report reviews at: info@aiscoutradar.com.

Please provide the following information:

  • URL of the affected review
  • Specific reasoning for the legal violation
  • Evidence / supporting documents (if available)
  • Contact person and role in the company

After receipt, we review the notice, document the decision internally, and take measures depending on the outcome (e.g., temporary hiding, deletion, follow-up questions). In disputed cases, we give the affected reviewer an opportunity to comment.

If a legal violation is plausibly presented, we may temporarily hide reviews pending clarification. We usually acknowledge receipt of a complaint within 72 hours.

For statements, we usually set a deadline of up to 7 calendar days. For factual claims, we may request reliable evidence from both sides. If key facts are not plausibly substantiated, the review may be removed in whole or in part.

If a review is temporarily deactivated, a counter-statement may be considered during the review process.

5. Updated reviews

When a user edits a review, we display the note “Review updated on ...”. Earlier versions are stored internally so abuse and manipulation can be verified.

6. Transparency

Details about sorting, review process, and sponsored content are available on our transparency page.

Version: March 2, 2026